To do this right, you cannot allow the rent-seekers to rebrand. You have to cut them out entirely. I don’t think this will fix everything that’s wrong with science; it will merely fix the wrongest thing. Nonprofit journals still charge fees, but at least the money goes to organizations that ostensibly care about science, rather than going to CEOs who make $17 million a year. And almost every journal, for-profit or not, uses the same failed system of peer review. The biggest benefit of shaking things up, then, would be allowing different approaches to have a chance at life, the same way an occasional forest fire clears away the dead wood, opens up the pinecones, and gives seedlings a shot at the sunlight.
卡塔爾外交部發言人譴責伊朗對其領土發動攻擊，並向記者表示這些行動「不會得不到回應」。
，推荐阅读safew官方下载获取更多信息
Sign up to see the future, today
用手动车床制作擀面杖的老手艺人
,or follow me on