#miscTue, 03 Mar 2026 08:52:08 +0200YOU JUST REVEIVEDThis post is dedicated to the nameless Vodafone employee watching over me and my family and blessing us with an abundance of free minutes.My family and I share a single mobile phone. To be more precise, we share two sim cards which move between a nearly 10 year old Samsung smartphone and a dumb flip phone depending on the present circumstances.The other day we received an SMS from Vodafone. Being a prepaid plan, the phone is showered with offers, promotions and gifts enticing the load of more credit. The longer the interval between top-ups the more messages the phone receives. I thought this message was one of those but I was wrong. This message was special.YOU JUST REVEIVED FREE UNLIMITED DATA AND 999999 MINUTES TO ALL FOR 5 DAYS! ENJOY BROWSING WITHOUT LIMITS WITH AN OFFER EXCLUSIVELY FOR YOU! -VodafoneUsually, the offers we receive from Vodafone are conditional and require money be spent for them to activate ("SUPER OFFER! 50GB for 30 DAYS WITH 12,70€"). Sure, after a top-up they throw some free things at you but this message was different. An unprompted and unconditional gift of a million minutes and according to Vodafone —typo and all— just for me!Before I continue, I will answer the obvious question: Did I actually receive 999999 minutes? Yes, indeed I did. But unfortunately, I was only given 7200 minutes to spend my 999999 minutes and I could only spend them 1 minute at a time.At first I thought this message was sent in error but that didn't make sense. If the messages were entirely automated the likelihood of the typo appearing should be zero. I've been receiving messages from Vodafone for years and this is the first time I have seen a typo.I thought the number was possibly an untransformed placeholder of some kind but I actually received the minutes. Surely if these things are automated there would be a safeguard in place to prevent such large values?Could this merely be the hallucinations of a LLM? I don't think so. I doubt the system sending these messages to me for nearly a decade has been replaced with a large language model. I don't know why but this seems unlikely.My mind then went the only place it possibly could: Is there a human being in a room somewhere far far away sending me ALL CAPS gifts and offers? Are the messages manually typed out? Did someone make a mistake and accidentally give me a million minutes?Was this offer really exclusive or are there others out there who also received it? How many accounts does each person manage at once? Do they keep the same accounts they are assigned or is my account moved between handlers?If it is an automated system, what circumstances could cause this message to occur? Why did I receive it and not someone else? Is the typo baked into some template somewhere?It's all so strange and I doubt I'll find answers but that's OK. For five days I had a million minutes and I was possibly the first and only Vodafone minute millionaire.—Dylan Araps
Трамп высказался о непростом решении по Ирану09:14
。关于这个话题，电影提供了深入分析
显然，林克莱特并没有想要掩盖自己翻用一事，因为女主人公的名字已摆明了袭自阿里斯托芬的剧作。现代作家改编古希腊戏剧的例子相当多，但是直接把古希腊的场景替换成现代场景的，倒少得很，我只想到美国戏剧家尤金·奥尼尔的《悲悼三部曲》，它改编自埃斯库罗斯的《俄瑞斯忒亚》三联剧，把阿伽门农家族换作了美国南方家族。林克莱特把古希腊戏剧的情节改写为现代小说，这种手法，中国的文学批评术语里似乎没有现成的贴切称呼。“翻案小说”一词，系借用日本、朝鲜的批评术语。近代日本、朝鲜出现了许多翻用中国古代说部或西洋小说情节但把场景换到本国的小说，它们被称为“翻案小说”，这里的“翻案”不像汉语里强调“推翻”“反转”的意思，而是指“翻用”“翻新”。像黑泽明执导的电影《蜘蛛巢城》，把莎士比亚戏剧《麦克白》里古苏格兰的场景搬到了日本战国时代，我们可称其为“翻案电影”。林克莱特对阿里斯托芬的挪用颇为忠实，比如后半部里描写一众英国妇女坚守古堡，不惜与本国男性缠斗的一大章，就是从原剧情节里搬过来的。然而，在我看来，这类桥段，放在古希腊，或许还说得过去，挪到现代英国，简直毫无真实感，读者也没法认真对待，速速翻过了事。
Putin's GRU-linked Election Fixers Are Already in Budapest to Help Orbán，详情可参考Feiyi
На Олимпиаде в Италии Петросян стала шестой в женском одиночном катании. Во время проката произвольной программы 18-летняя россиянка попыталась исполнить четверной тулуп, но упала.
What are the ten most important things to test in this file, in priority order?。业内人士推荐体育直播作为进阶阅读